1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
|
===================
python-atomicwrites
===================
.. image:: https://travis-ci.com/untitaker/python-atomicwrites.svg?branch=master
:target: https://travis-ci.com/untitaker/python-atomicwrites
.. image:: https://ci.appveyor.com/api/projects/status/vadc4le3c27to59x/branch/master?svg=true
:target: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/untitaker/python-atomicwrites/branch/master
.. image:: https://readthedocs.org/projects/python-atomicwrites/badge/?version=latest
:target: https://python-atomicwrites.readthedocs.io/en/latest/?badge=latest
:alt: Documentation Status
**Atomic file writes.**
.. code-block:: python
from atomicwrites import atomic_write
with atomic_write('foo.txt', overwrite=True) as f:
f.write('Hello world.')
# "foo.txt" doesn't exist yet.
# Now it does.
See `API documentation <https://python-atomicwrites.readthedocs.io/en/latest/#api>`_ for more
low-level interfaces.
Features that distinguish it from other similar libraries (see `Alternatives and Credit`_):
- Race-free assertion that the target file doesn't yet exist. This can be
controlled with the ``overwrite`` parameter.
- Windows support, although not well-tested. The MSDN resources are not very
explicit about which operations are atomic. I'm basing my assumptions off `a
comment
<https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsdesktop/en-US/449bb49d-8acc-48dc-a46f-0760ceddbfc3/movefileexmovefilereplaceexisting-ntfs-same-volume-atomic?forum=windowssdk#a239bc26-eaf0-4920-9f21-440bd2be9cc8>`_
by `Doug Cook
<https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/doug%20e.%20cook>`_, who appears
to be a Microsoft employee:
Question: Is MoveFileEx atomic if the existing and new
files are both on the same drive?
The simple answer is "usually, but in some cases it will silently fall-back
to a non-atomic method, so don't count on it".
The implementation of MoveFileEx looks something like this: [...]
The problem is if the rename fails, you might end up with a CopyFile, which
is definitely not atomic.
If you really need atomic-or-nothing, you can try calling
NtSetInformationFile, which is unsupported but is much more likely to be
atomic.
- Simple high-level API that wraps a very flexible class-based API.
- Consistent error handling across platforms.
How it works
============
It uses a temporary file in the same directory as the given path. This ensures
that the temporary file resides on the same filesystem.
The temporary file will then be atomically moved to the target location: On
POSIX, it will use ``rename`` if files should be overwritten, otherwise a
combination of ``link`` and ``unlink``. On Windows, it uses MoveFileEx_ through
stdlib's ``ctypes`` with the appropriate flags.
Note that with ``link`` and ``unlink``, there's a timewindow where the file
might be available under two entries in the filesystem: The name of the
temporary file, and the name of the target file.
Also note that the permissions of the target file may change this way. In some
situations a ``chmod`` can be issued without any concurrency problems, but
since that is not always the case, this library doesn't do it by itself.
.. _MoveFileEx: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365240%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
fsync
-----
On POSIX, ``fsync`` is invoked on the temporary file after it is written (to
flush file content and metadata), and on the parent directory after the file is
moved (to flush filename).
``fsync`` does not take care of disks' internal buffers, but there don't seem
to be any standard POSIX APIs for that. On OS X, ``fcntl`` is used with
``F_FULLFSYNC`` instead of ``fsync`` for that reason.
On Windows, `_commit <https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/17618685.aspx>`_
is used, but there are no guarantees about disk internal buffers.
Alternatives and Credit
=======================
Atomicwrites is directly inspired by the following libraries (and shares a
minimal amount of code):
- The Trac project's `utility functions
<http://www.edgewall.org/docs/tags-trac-0.11.7/epydoc/trac.util-pysrc.html>`_,
also used in `Werkzeug <http://werkzeug.pocoo.org/>`_ and
`mitsuhiko/python-atomicfile
<https://github.com/mitsuhiko/python-atomicfile>`_. The idea to use
``ctypes`` instead of ``PyWin32`` originated there.
- `abarnert/fatomic <https://github.com/abarnert/fatomic>`_. Windows support
(based on ``PyWin32``) was originally taken from there.
Other alternatives to atomicwrites include:
- `sashka/atomicfile <https://github.com/sashka/atomicfile>`_. Originally I
considered using that, but at the time it was lacking a lot of features I
needed (Windows support, overwrite-parameter, overriding behavior through
subclassing).
- The `Boltons library collection <https://github.com/mahmoud/boltons>`_
features a class for atomic file writes, which seems to have a very similar
``overwrite`` parameter. It is lacking Windows support though.
License
=======
Licensed under the MIT, see ``LICENSE``.
|
