YQL-19206 Move contrib/ydb/library/yql/tests/postgresql -> yql/essentials/tests/postgresql

commit_hash:46fdf59714b20cf2b61233a06e58365227d3c8b2

1 files changed, 398 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/yql/essentials/tests/postgresql/cases/join.sql b/yql/essentials/tests/postgresql/cases/join.sql
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..38db347d39
--- /dev/null
+++ b/yql/essentials/tests/postgresql/cases/join.sql
@@ -0,0 +1,398 @@
+--
+-- JOIN
+-- Test JOIN clauses
+--
+CREATE TABLE J1_TBL (
+  i integer,
+  j integer,
+  t text
+);
+CREATE TABLE J2_TBL (
+  i integer,
+  k integer
+);
+INSERT INTO J1_TBL VALUES (1, 4, 'one');
+INSERT INTO J1_TBL VALUES (2, 3, 'two');
+INSERT INTO J1_TBL VALUES (3, 2, 'three');
+INSERT INTO J1_TBL VALUES (4, 1, 'four');
+INSERT INTO J1_TBL VALUES (5, 0, 'five');
+INSERT INTO J1_TBL VALUES (6, 6, 'six');
+INSERT INTO J1_TBL VALUES (7, 7, 'seven');
+INSERT INTO J1_TBL VALUES (8, 8, 'eight');
+INSERT INTO J1_TBL VALUES (0, NULL, 'zero');
+INSERT INTO J1_TBL VALUES (NULL, NULL, 'null');
+INSERT INTO J1_TBL VALUES (NULL, 0, 'zero');
+INSERT INTO J2_TBL VALUES (1, -1);
+INSERT INTO J2_TBL VALUES (2, 2);
+INSERT INTO J2_TBL VALUES (3, -3);
+INSERT INTO J2_TBL VALUES (2, 4);
+INSERT INTO J2_TBL VALUES (5, -5);
+INSERT INTO J2_TBL VALUES (5, -5);
+INSERT INTO J2_TBL VALUES (0, NULL);
+INSERT INTO J2_TBL VALUES (NULL, NULL);
+INSERT INTO J2_TBL VALUES (NULL, 0);
+-- useful in some tests below
+create temp table onerow();
+--
+-- CORRELATION NAMES
+-- Make sure that table/column aliases are supported
+-- before diving into more complex join syntax.
+--
+SELECT *
+  FROM J1_TBL AS tx;
+SELECT *
+  FROM J1_TBL tx;
+SELECT *
+  FROM J1_TBL AS t1 (a, b, c);
+SELECT *
+  FROM J1_TBL t1 (a, b, c);
+SELECT *
+  FROM J1_TBL t1 (a, b, c) JOIN J2_TBL t2 (a, d) USING (a)
+  ORDER BY a, d;
+-- test join using aliases
+SELECT * FROM J1_TBL JOIN J2_TBL USING (i) WHERE J1_TBL.t = 'one';  -- ok
+SELECT *
+  FROM J1_TBL LEFT JOIN J2_TBL USING (i) WHERE (k = 1);
+--
+-- More complicated constructs
+--
+--
+-- Multiway full join
+--
+CREATE TABLE t1 (name TEXT, n INTEGER);
+CREATE TABLE t2 (name TEXT, n INTEGER);
+CREATE TABLE t3 (name TEXT, n INTEGER);
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES ( 'bb', 11 );
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES ( 'bb', 12 );
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES ( 'cc', 22 );
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES ( 'ee', 42 );
+INSERT INTO t3 VALUES ( 'bb', 13 );
+INSERT INTO t3 VALUES ( 'cc', 23 );
+INSERT INTO t3 VALUES ( 'dd', 33 );
+-- Test for propagation of nullability constraints into sub-joins
+create temp table x (x1 int, x2 int);
+insert into x values (1,11);
+insert into x values (2,22);
+insert into x values (3,null);
+insert into x values (4,44);
+insert into x values (5,null);
+create temp table y (y1 int, y2 int);
+insert into y values (1,111);
+insert into y values (2,222);
+insert into y values (3,333);
+insert into y values (4,null);
+select * from x;
+select * from y;
+select * from (x left join y on (x1 = y1)) left join x xx(xx1,xx2)
+on (x1 = xx1);
+select * from (x left join y on (x1 = y1)) left join x xx(xx1,xx2)
+on (x1 = xx1 and xx2 is not null);
+-- these should NOT give the same answers as above
+select * from (x left join y on (x1 = y1)) left join x xx(xx1,xx2)
+on (x1 = xx1) where (x2 is not null);
+select * from (x left join y on (x1 = y1)) left join x xx(xx1,xx2)
+on (x1 = xx1) where (y2 is not null);
+select * from (x left join y on (x1 = y1)) left join x xx(xx1,xx2)
+on (x1 = xx1) where (xx2 is not null);
+--
+-- regression test: check for bug with propagation of implied equality
+-- to outside an IN
+--
+select count(*) from tenk1 a where unique1 in
+  (select unique1 from tenk1 b join tenk1 c using (unique1)
+   where b.unique2 = 42);
+-- try that with GEQO too
+begin;
+rollback;
+--
+-- regression test: check a case where join_clause_is_movable_into() gives
+-- an imprecise result, causing an assertion failure
+--
+select count(*)
+from
+  (select t3.tenthous as x1, coalesce(t1.stringu1, t2.stringu1) as x2
+   from tenk1 t1
+   left join tenk1 t2 on t1.unique1 = t2.unique1
+   join tenk1 t3 on t1.unique2 = t3.unique2) ss,
+  tenk1 t4,
+  tenk1 t5
+where t4.thousand = t5.unique1 and ss.x1 = t4.tenthous and ss.x2 = t5.stringu1;
+select count(*) from
+  (select * from tenk1 x order by x.thousand, x.twothousand, x.fivethous) x
+  left join
+  (select * from tenk1 y order by y.unique2) y
+  on x.thousand = y.unique2 and x.twothousand = y.hundred and x.fivethous = y.unique2;
+--
+-- Clean up
+--
+DROP TABLE t1;
+DROP TABLE t2;
+DROP TABLE t3;
+DROP TABLE J1_TBL;
+DROP TABLE J2_TBL;
+-- Both DELETE and UPDATE allow the specification of additional tables
+-- to "join" against to determine which rows should be modified.
+CREATE TEMP TABLE t1 (a int, b int);
+CREATE TEMP TABLE t2 (a int, b int);
+CREATE TEMP TABLE t3 (x int, y int);
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (5, 10);
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (15, 20);
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (100, 100);
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (200, 1000);
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (200, 2000);
+INSERT INTO t3 VALUES (5, 20);
+INSERT INTO t3 VALUES (6, 7);
+INSERT INTO t3 VALUES (7, 8);
+INSERT INTO t3 VALUES (500, 100);
+--
+-- regression test for 8.1 merge right join bug
+--
+CREATE TEMP TABLE tt1 ( tt1_id int4, joincol int4 );
+INSERT INTO tt1 VALUES (1, 11);
+INSERT INTO tt1 VALUES (2, NULL);
+CREATE TEMP TABLE tt2 ( tt2_id int4, joincol int4 );
+INSERT INTO tt2 VALUES (21, 11);
+INSERT INTO tt2 VALUES (22, 11);
+select count(*) from tenk1 a, tenk1 b
+  where a.hundred = b.thousand and (b.fivethous % 10) < 10;
+--
+-- regression test for 8.2 bug with improper re-ordering of left joins
+--
+create temp table tt3(f1 int, f2 text);
+insert into tt3 select x, repeat('xyzzy', 100) from generate_series(1,10000) x;
+create index tt3i on tt3(f1);
+create temp table tt4(f1 int);
+insert into tt4 values (0),(1),(9999);
+--
+-- regression test for proper handling of outer joins within antijoins
+--
+create temp table tt4x(c1 int, c2 int, c3 int);
+--
+-- regression test for problems of the sort depicted in bug #3494
+--
+create temp table tt5(f1 int, f2 int);
+create temp table tt6(f1 int, f2 int);
+insert into tt5 values(1, 10);
+insert into tt5 values(1, 11);
+insert into tt6 values(1, 9);
+insert into tt6 values(1, 2);
+insert into tt6 values(2, 9);
+--
+-- regression test for problems of the sort depicted in bug #3588
+--
+create temp table xx (pkxx int);
+create temp table yy (pkyy int, pkxx int);
+insert into xx values (1);
+insert into xx values (2);
+insert into xx values (3);
+insert into yy values (101, 1);
+insert into yy values (201, 2);
+insert into yy values (301, NULL);
+--
+-- regression test for improper pushing of constants across outer-join clauses
+-- (as seen in early 8.2.x releases)
+--
+create temp table zt1 (f1 int primary key);
+create temp table zt2 (f2 int primary key);
+create temp table zt3 (f3 int primary key);
+insert into zt1 values(53);
+insert into zt2 values(53);
+select * from
+  zt2 left join zt3 on (f2 = f3)
+      left join zt1 on (f3 = f1)
+where f2 = 53;
+--
+-- test for sane behavior with noncanonical merge clauses, per bug #4926
+--
+begin;
+create temp table a (i integer);
+create temp table b (x integer, y integer);
+select * from a left join b on i = x and i = y and x = i;
+rollback;
+--
+-- test handling of merge clauses using record_ops
+--
+begin;
+create temp table tidv (idv mycomptype);
+create index on tidv (idv);
+rollback;
+--
+-- test incorrect failure to NULL pulled-up subexpressions
+--
+begin;
+create temp table a (
+     code char not null,
+     constraint a_pk primary key (code)
+);
+create temp table b (
+     a char not null,
+     num integer not null,
+     constraint b_pk primary key (a, num)
+);
+create temp table c (
+     name char not null,
+     a char,
+     constraint c_pk primary key (name)
+);
+insert into a (code) values ('p');
+insert into a (code) values ('q');
+insert into b (a, num) values ('p', 1);
+insert into b (a, num) values ('p', 2);
+insert into c (name, a) values ('A', 'p');
+insert into c (name, a) values ('B', 'q');
+insert into c (name, a) values ('C', null);
+rollback;
+--
+-- test incorrect handling of placeholders that only appear in targetlists,
+-- per bug #6154
+--
+SELECT * FROM
+( SELECT 1 as key1 ) sub1
+LEFT JOIN
+( SELECT sub3.key3, sub4.value2, COALESCE(sub4.value2, 66) as value3 FROM
+    ( SELECT 1 as key3 ) sub3
+    LEFT JOIN
+    ( SELECT sub5.key5, COALESCE(sub6.value1, 1) as value2 FROM
+        ( SELECT 1 as key5 ) sub5
+        LEFT JOIN
+        ( SELECT 2 as key6, 42 as value1 ) sub6
+        ON sub5.key5 = sub6.key6
+    ) sub4
+    ON sub4.key5 = sub3.key3
+) sub2
+ON sub1.key1 = sub2.key3;
+-- test the path using join aliases, too
+SELECT * FROM
+( SELECT 1 as key1 ) sub1
+LEFT JOIN
+( SELECT sub3.key3, value2, COALESCE(value2, 66) as value3 FROM
+    ( SELECT 1 as key3 ) sub3
+    LEFT JOIN
+    ( SELECT sub5.key5, COALESCE(sub6.value1, 1) as value2 FROM
+        ( SELECT 1 as key5 ) sub5
+        LEFT JOIN
+        ( SELECT 2 as key6, 42 as value1 ) sub6
+        ON sub5.key5 = sub6.key6
+    ) sub4
+    ON sub4.key5 = sub3.key3
+) sub2
+ON sub1.key1 = sub2.key3;
+--
+-- nested nestloops can require nested PlaceHolderVars
+--
+create temp table nt1 (
+  id int primary key,
+  a1 boolean,
+  a2 boolean
+);
+insert into nt1 values (1,true,true);
+insert into nt1 values (2,true,false);
+insert into nt1 values (3,false,false);
+select * from
+  int8_tbl t1 left join
+  (select q1 as x, 42 as y from int8_tbl t2) ss
+  on t1.q2 = ss.x
+where
+  1 = (select 1 from int8_tbl t3 where ss.y is not null limit 1)
+order by 1,2;
+select t1.unique2, t1.stringu1, t2.unique1, t2.stringu2 from
+  tenk1 t1
+  inner join int4_tbl i1
+    left join (select v1.x2, v2.y1, 11 AS d1
+               from (values(1,0)) v1(x1,x2)
+               left join (values(3,1)) v2(y1,y2)
+               on v1.x1 = v2.y2) subq1
+    on (i1.f1 = subq1.x2)
+  on (t1.unique2 = subq1.d1)
+  left join tenk1 t2
+  on (subq1.y1 = t2.unique1)
+where t1.unique2 < 42 and t1.stringu1 > t2.stringu2;
+select count(*) from
+  tenk1 a join tenk1 b on a.unique1 = b.unique2
+  left join tenk1 c on a.unique2 = b.unique1 and c.thousand = a.thousand
+  join int4_tbl on b.thousand = f1;
+select f1, unique2, case when unique2 is null then f1 else 0 end
+  from int4_tbl a left join tenk1 b on f1 = unique2
+  where (case when unique2 is null then f1 else 0 end) = 0;
+--
+-- test join removal
+--
+begin;
+CREATE TEMP TABLE a (id int PRIMARY KEY, b_id int);
+CREATE TEMP TABLE b (id int PRIMARY KEY, c_id int);
+CREATE TEMP TABLE c (id int PRIMARY KEY);
+CREATE TEMP TABLE d (a int, b int);
+INSERT INTO b VALUES (0, 0), (1, NULL);
+INSERT INTO c VALUES (0), (1);
+INSERT INTO d VALUES (1,3), (2,2), (3,1);
+rollback;
+create temp table parent (k int primary key, pd int);
+create temp table child (k int unique, cd int);
+insert into parent values (1, 10), (2, 20), (3, 30);
+insert into child values (1, 100), (4, 400);
+-- check for a 9.0rc1 bug: join removal breaks pseudoconstant qual handling
+select p.* from
+  parent p left join child c on (p.k = c.k)
+  where p.k = 1 and p.k = 2;
+select p.* from
+  (parent p left join child c on (p.k = c.k)) join parent x on p.k = x.k
+  where p.k = 1 and p.k = 2;
+-- bug 5255: this is not optimizable by join removal
+begin;
+CREATE TEMP TABLE a (id int PRIMARY KEY);
+CREATE TEMP TABLE b (id int PRIMARY KEY, a_id int);
+INSERT INTO a VALUES (0), (1);
+INSERT INTO b VALUES (0, 0), (1, NULL);
+rollback;
+-- another join removal bug: this is not optimizable, either
+begin;
+create temp table innertab (id int8 primary key, dat1 int8);
+insert into innertab values(123, 42);
+rollback;
+-- another join removal bug: we must clean up correctly when removing a PHV
+begin;
+create temp table uniquetbl (f1 text unique);
+rollback;
+create table join_ut1 (a int, b int, c varchar);
+insert into join_ut1 values (101, 101, 'y'), (2, 2, 'z');
+drop table join_ut1;
+--
+-- test estimation behavior with multi-column foreign key and constant qual
+--
+begin;
+create table fkest (x integer, x10 integer, x10b integer, x100 integer);
+insert into fkest select x, x/10, x/10, x/100 from generate_series(1,1000) x;
+rollback;
+--
+-- test that foreign key join estimation performs sanely for outer joins
+--
+begin;
+create table fkest (a int, b int, c int unique, primary key(a,b));
+create table fkest1 (a int, b int, primary key(a,b));
+insert into fkest select x/10, x%10, x from generate_series(1,1000) x;
+insert into fkest1 select x/10, x%10 from generate_series(1,1000) x;
+rollback;
+--
+-- test planner's ability to mark joins as unique
+--
+create table j1 (id int primary key);
+create table j2 (id int primary key);
+create table j3 (id int);
+insert into j1 values(1),(2),(3);
+insert into j2 values(1),(2),(3);
+insert into j3 values(1),(1);
+drop table j1;
+drop table j2;
+drop table j3;
+-- test more complex permutations of unique joins
+create table j1 (id1 int, id2 int, primary key(id1,id2));
+create table j2 (id1 int, id2 int, primary key(id1,id2));
+create table j3 (id1 int, id2 int, primary key(id1,id2));
+insert into j1 values(1,1),(1,2);
+insert into j2 values(1,1);
+insert into j3 values(1,1);
+-- need an additional row in j2, if we want j2_id1_idx to be preferred
+insert into j2 values(1,2);
+drop table j1;
+drop table j2;
+drop table j3;