Restoring authorship annotation for Mikhail Borisov <borisov.mikhail@gmail.com>. Commit 1 of 2.

1 files changed, 158 insertions, 158 deletions

diff --git a/contrib/python/ipython/py2/IPython/testing/plugin/dtexample.py b/contrib/python/ipython/py2/IPython/testing/plugin/dtexample.py
index 5e02629bf7..081bf35571 100644
--- a/contrib/python/ipython/py2/IPython/testing/plugin/dtexample.py
+++ b/contrib/python/ipython/py2/IPython/testing/plugin/dtexample.py
@@ -1,158 +1,158 @@
-"""Simple example using doctests.
-
-This file just contains doctests both using plain python and IPython prompts.
-All tests should be loaded by nose.
-"""
-from __future__ import print_function
-
-def pyfunc():
-    """Some pure python tests...
-
-    >>> pyfunc()
-    'pyfunc'
-
-    >>> import os
-
-    >>> 2+3
-    5
-
-    >>> for i in range(3):
-    ...     print(i, end=' ')
-    ...     print(i+1, end=' ')
-    ...
-    0 1 1 2 2 3 
-    """
-    return 'pyfunc'
-
-def ipfunc():
-    """Some ipython tests...
-
-    In [1]: import os
-
-    In [3]: 2+3
-    Out[3]: 5
-
-    In [26]: for i in range(3):
-       ....:     print(i, end=' ')
-       ....:     print(i+1, end=' ')
-       ....:
-    0 1 1 2 2 3 
-
-
-    Examples that access the operating system work:
-
-    In [1]: !echo hello
-    hello
-
-    In [2]: !echo hello > /tmp/foo_iptest
-
-    In [3]: !cat /tmp/foo_iptest
-    hello
-
-    In [4]: rm -f /tmp/foo_iptest
-
-    It's OK to use '_' for the last result, but do NOT try to use IPython's
-    numbered history of _NN outputs, since those won't exist under the
-    doctest environment:
-
-    In [7]: 'hi'
-    Out[7]: 'hi'
-
-    In [8]: print(repr(_))
-    'hi'
-    
-    In [7]: 3+4
-    Out[7]: 7
-
-    In [8]: _+3
-    Out[8]: 10
-
-    In [9]: ipfunc()
-    Out[9]: 'ipfunc'
-    """
-    return 'ipfunc'
-
-
-def ranfunc():
-    """A function with some random output.
-
-       Normal examples are verified as usual:
-       >>> 1+3
-       4
-
-       But if you put '# random' in the output, it is ignored:
-       >>> 1+3
-       junk goes here...  # random
-
-       >>> 1+2
-       again,  anything goes #random
-       if multiline, the random mark is only needed once.
-
-       >>> 1+2
-       You can also put the random marker at the end:
-       # random
-
-       >>> 1+2
-       # random
-       .. or at the beginning.
-
-       More correct input is properly verified:
-       >>> ranfunc()
-       'ranfunc'
-    """
-    return 'ranfunc'
-
-
-def random_all():
-    """A function where we ignore the output of ALL examples.
-
-    Examples:
-
-      # all-random
-
-      This mark tells the testing machinery that all subsequent examples should
-      be treated as random (ignoring their output).  They are still executed,
-      so if a they raise an error, it will be detected as such, but their
-      output is completely ignored.
-
-      >>> 1+3
-      junk goes here...
-
-      >>> 1+3
-      klasdfj;
-
-      >>> 1+2
-      again,  anything goes
-      blah...
-    """
-    pass
-
-def iprand():
-    """Some ipython tests with random output.
-
-    In [7]: 3+4
-    Out[7]: 7
-
-    In [8]: print('hello')
-    world  # random
-
-    In [9]: iprand()
-    Out[9]: 'iprand'
-    """
-    return 'iprand'
-
-def iprand_all():
-    """Some ipython tests with fully random output.
-
-    # all-random
-    
-    In [7]: 1
-    Out[7]: 99
-
-    In [8]: print('hello')
-    world
-
-    In [9]: iprand_all()
-    Out[9]: 'junk'
-    """
-    return 'iprand_all'
+"""Simple example using doctests. 
+ 
+This file just contains doctests both using plain python and IPython prompts. 
+All tests should be loaded by nose. 
+""" 
+from __future__ import print_function 
+ 
+def pyfunc(): 
+    """Some pure python tests... 
+ 
+    >>> pyfunc() 
+    'pyfunc' 
+ 
+    >>> import os 
+ 
+    >>> 2+3 
+    5 
+ 
+    >>> for i in range(3): 
+    ...     print(i, end=' ') 
+    ...     print(i+1, end=' ') 
+    ... 
+    0 1 1 2 2 3  
+    """ 
+    return 'pyfunc' 
+ 
+def ipfunc(): 
+    """Some ipython tests... 
+ 
+    In [1]: import os 
+ 
+    In [3]: 2+3 
+    Out[3]: 5 
+ 
+    In [26]: for i in range(3): 
+       ....:     print(i, end=' ') 
+       ....:     print(i+1, end=' ') 
+       ....: 
+    0 1 1 2 2 3  
+ 
+ 
+    Examples that access the operating system work: 
+ 
+    In [1]: !echo hello 
+    hello 
+ 
+    In [2]: !echo hello > /tmp/foo_iptest 
+ 
+    In [3]: !cat /tmp/foo_iptest 
+    hello 
+ 
+    In [4]: rm -f /tmp/foo_iptest 
+ 
+    It's OK to use '_' for the last result, but do NOT try to use IPython's 
+    numbered history of _NN outputs, since those won't exist under the 
+    doctest environment: 
+ 
+    In [7]: 'hi' 
+    Out[7]: 'hi' 
+ 
+    In [8]: print(repr(_)) 
+    'hi' 
+     
+    In [7]: 3+4 
+    Out[7]: 7 
+ 
+    In [8]: _+3 
+    Out[8]: 10 
+ 
+    In [9]: ipfunc() 
+    Out[9]: 'ipfunc' 
+    """ 
+    return 'ipfunc' 
+ 
+ 
+def ranfunc(): 
+    """A function with some random output. 
+ 
+       Normal examples are verified as usual: 
+       >>> 1+3 
+       4 
+ 
+       But if you put '# random' in the output, it is ignored: 
+       >>> 1+3 
+       junk goes here...  # random 
+ 
+       >>> 1+2 
+       again,  anything goes #random 
+       if multiline, the random mark is only needed once. 
+ 
+       >>> 1+2 
+       You can also put the random marker at the end: 
+       # random 
+ 
+       >>> 1+2 
+       # random 
+       .. or at the beginning. 
+ 
+       More correct input is properly verified: 
+       >>> ranfunc() 
+       'ranfunc' 
+    """ 
+    return 'ranfunc' 
+ 
+ 
+def random_all(): 
+    """A function where we ignore the output of ALL examples. 
+ 
+    Examples: 
+ 
+      # all-random 
+ 
+      This mark tells the testing machinery that all subsequent examples should 
+      be treated as random (ignoring their output).  They are still executed, 
+      so if a they raise an error, it will be detected as such, but their 
+      output is completely ignored. 
+ 
+      >>> 1+3 
+      junk goes here... 
+ 
+      >>> 1+3 
+      klasdfj; 
+ 
+      >>> 1+2 
+      again,  anything goes 
+      blah... 
+    """ 
+    pass 
+ 
+def iprand(): 
+    """Some ipython tests with random output. 
+ 
+    In [7]: 3+4 
+    Out[7]: 7 
+ 
+    In [8]: print('hello') 
+    world  # random 
+ 
+    In [9]: iprand() 
+    Out[9]: 'iprand' 
+    """ 
+    return 'iprand' 
+ 
+def iprand_all(): 
+    """Some ipython tests with fully random output. 
+ 
+    # all-random 
+     
+    In [7]: 1 
+    Out[7]: 99 
+ 
+    In [8]: print('hello') 
+    world 
+ 
+    In [9]: iprand_all() 
+    Out[9]: 'junk' 
+    """ 
+    return 'iprand_all'