1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
|
/* IELR's inadequacy annotation list.
Copyright (C) 2009-2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This file is part of Bison, the GNU Compiler Compiler.
This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
#include <config.h>
#include "system.h"
#include "AnnotationList.h"
#include "lalr.h"
#include "ielr.h"
/**
* \pre
* - <tt>annotations_obstackp != NULL</tt>.
* \post
* - \c result is a new \c AnnotationList with one node whose:
* - \c inadequacyNode member is \c NULL.
* - \c contributions member is allocated with \c contribution_count
* uninitialized elements.
* - All memory was allocated on \c annotations_obstackp.
*/
static AnnotationList*
AnnotationList__alloc_on_obstack (ContributionIndex contribution_count,
struct obstack *annotations_obstackp)
{
AnnotationList *result;
size_t contributions_size =
contribution_count * sizeof result->contributions[0];
result = obstack_alloc (annotations_obstackp,
offsetof (AnnotationList, contributions)
+ contributions_size);
result->next = NULL;
result->inadequacyNode = NULL;
return result;
}
/**
* \pre
* - <tt>self != NULL</tt>.
* - <tt>0 <= ci < self->inadequacyNode->contributionCount</tt>.
* \post
* - \c result = true iff contribution \c ci in \c self represents an
* "always" contribution.
*/
static bool
AnnotationList__isContributionAlways (AnnotationList const *self,
ContributionIndex ci)
{
aver (0 <= ci && ci < self->inadequacyNode->contributionCount);
return self->contributions[ci] == NULL;
}
/**
* \pre
* - \c self is a single node.
* - \c self annotates the same state as every other node in \c list, and
* that state has \c nitems kernel items.
* \post
* - If the list \c list already contains an identical annotation to \c self,
* \c self was discarded, \c result is false, and the caller is responsible
* for the memory of \c self.
* - Otherwise, \c list now contains the node \c self, \c result is true, and
* \c list assumes responsibility for the memory of \c self.
* - The sort in \c list is:
* - Sort in reverse order on the unique ID of the associated
* inadequacy node. Because these IDs are assigned in ascending
* order, this should mean that the insertion position within an
* annotation list is usually near the beginning with other
* annotations associated with the same inadequacy.
* - Next, sort on the first contribution that is different as follows:
* - Sort an always-contribution before a never-contribution before a
* potential-contribution.
* - Two always-contributions are identical.
* - Two never-contributions are identical.
* - For two potential-contributions, sort on the contributions' kernel
* item bitsets interpreted as binary numbers.
* - The sorting has a few effects:
* - It accelerates elimination of identical annotations during insertion.
* - It determines how the output of \c AnnotationList__debug is sorted.
* - Other than that, it's probably not important.
*/
static bool
AnnotationList__insertInto (AnnotationList *self, AnnotationList **list,
size_t nitems)
{
AnnotationList **node;
for (node = list; *node; node = &(*node)->next)
{
int cmp = 0;
ContributionIndex ci;
if (self->inadequacyNode->id < (*node)->inadequacyNode->id)
cmp = 1;
else if ((*node)->inadequacyNode->id < self->inadequacyNode->id)
cmp = -1;
else
for (ci = 0;
cmp == 0 && ci < self->inadequacyNode->contributionCount;
++ci)
{
if (AnnotationList__isContributionAlways (self, ci))
{
if (!AnnotationList__isContributionAlways (*node, ci))
cmp = -1;
}
else if (AnnotationList__isContributionAlways (*node, ci))
cmp = 1;
else
{
size_t item;
for (item = 0; cmp == 0 && item < nitems; ++item)
{
if (!Sbitset__test (self->contributions[ci], item))
{
if (Sbitset__test ((*node)->contributions[ci], item))
cmp = -1;
}
else if (!Sbitset__test ((*node)->contributions[ci], item))
cmp = 1;
}
}
}
if (cmp < 0)
{
self->next = *node;
*node = self;
break;
}
else if (cmp == 0)
{
self = NULL;
break;
}
}
if (!*node)
*node = self;
return self != NULL;
}
static bitset
AnnotationList__compute_shift_tokens (transitions *trans)
{
bitset shift_tokens = bitset_create (ntokens, BITSET_FIXED);
int i;
FOR_EACH_SHIFT (trans, i)
bitset_set (shift_tokens, TRANSITION_SYMBOL (trans, i));
return shift_tokens;
}
static bitset
AnnotationList__compute_conflicted_tokens (bitset shift_tokens,
reductions *reds)
{
bitset conflicted_tokens = bitset_create (ntokens, BITSET_FIXED);
bitset conflicted_tokens_rule = bitset_create (ntokens, BITSET_FIXED);
bitset tokens = bitset_create (ntokens, BITSET_FIXED);
int i;
bitset_copy (tokens, shift_tokens);
for (i = 0; i < reds->num; ++i)
{
bitset_and (conflicted_tokens_rule, tokens, reds->lookahead_tokens[i]);
bitset_or (conflicted_tokens,
conflicted_tokens, conflicted_tokens_rule);
bitset_or (tokens, tokens, reds->lookahead_tokens[i]);
/* Check that rules are sorted on rule number or the next step in
AnnotationList__compute_from_inadequacies will misbehave. */
aver (i == 0 || reds->rules[i-1] < reds->rules[i]);
}
bitset_free (tokens);
bitset_free (conflicted_tokens_rule);
return conflicted_tokens;
}
static bool
AnnotationList__compute_lhs_contributions (state *s, rule *the_rule,
symbol_number conflicted_token,
bitsetv follow_kernel_items,
bitsetv always_follows,
state ***predecessors,
bitset **item_lookahead_sets,
Sbitset *items,
struct obstack
*annotations_obstackp)
{
goto_number lhs_goto = map_goto (s->number, the_rule->lhs->number);
if (bitset_test (always_follows[lhs_goto], conflicted_token))
return true;
*items = Sbitset__new_on_obstack (s->nitems, annotations_obstackp);
{
bitset_iterator biter_item;
bitset_bindex item;
BITSET_FOR_EACH (biter_item, follow_kernel_items[lhs_goto], item, 0)
if (ielr_item_has_lookahead (s, 0, item, conflicted_token,
predecessors, item_lookahead_sets))
Sbitset__set (*items, item);
}
return false;
}
static void
AnnotationList__computePredecessorAnnotations (AnnotationList *self, state *s,
bitsetv follow_kernel_items,
bitsetv always_follows,
state ***predecessors,
bitset **item_lookahead_sets,
AnnotationList
**annotation_lists,
AnnotationIndex
*annotation_counts,
struct obstack
*annotations_obstackp)
{
state **predecessor;
bitset *lookaheads;
for (predecessor = predecessors[s->number]; *predecessor; ++predecessor)
{
AnnotationList *annotation_node =
AnnotationList__alloc_on_obstack (
self->inadequacyNode->contributionCount, annotations_obstackp);
bool potential_contribution = false;
annotation_node->inadequacyNode = self->inadequacyNode;
lookaheads = NULL;
{
ContributionIndex ci;
for (ci = 0; ci < self->inadequacyNode->contributionCount; ++ci)
{
symbol_number contribution_token =
InadequacyList__getContributionToken (self->inadequacyNode, ci)
->number;
if (AnnotationList__isContributionAlways (self, ci))
{
annotation_node->contributions[ci] = NULL;
continue;
}
annotation_node->contributions[ci] =
Sbitset__new_on_obstack ((*predecessor)->nitems,
annotations_obstackp);
{
size_t predecessor_item = 0;
Sbitset sbiter_item;
Sbitset__Index self_item;
SBITSET__FOR_EACH (self->contributions[ci], s->nitems,
sbiter_item, self_item)
{
/* If this kernel item is the beginning of a RHS, it must be
the kernel item in the start state, and so it has an empty
lookahead set. Thus, it can't contribute to inadequacies,
and so it should never have been identified as a
contribution. If, instead, this kernel item is the
successor of the start state's kernel item, the lookahead
set is still empty, and so it also should never have been
identified as a contribution. This situation is fortunate
because we want to avoid the - 2 below in both cases. */
aver (s->items[self_item] > 1);
/* If this kernel item is next to the beginning of the RHS,
then check all of the predecessor's goto follows for the
LHS. */
if (item_number_is_rule_number (ritem[s->items[self_item]
- 2]))
{
Sbitset items;
unsigned int rulei;
for (rulei = s->items[self_item];
!item_number_is_rule_number (ritem[rulei]);
++rulei)
;
if (AnnotationList__compute_lhs_contributions (
*predecessor,
&rules[item_number_as_rule_number (ritem[rulei])],
contribution_token,
follow_kernel_items, always_follows, predecessors,
item_lookahead_sets, &items, annotations_obstackp))
{
obstack_free (annotations_obstackp,
annotation_node->contributions[ci]);
annotation_node->contributions[ci] = NULL;
break;
}
else
{
Sbitset__or (annotation_node->contributions[ci],
annotation_node->contributions[ci],
items, (*predecessor)->nitems);
obstack_free (annotations_obstackp, items);
}
}
/* If this kernel item is later in the RHS, then check the
predecessor item's lookahead set. */
else
{
/* We don't have to start the predecessor item search at
the beginning every time because items from both
states are sorted by their indices in ritem. */
for (;
predecessor_item < (*predecessor)->nitems;
++predecessor_item)
if ((*predecessor)->items[predecessor_item]
== s->items[self_item] - 1)
break;
aver (predecessor_item != (*predecessor)->nitems);
if (ielr_item_has_lookahead (*predecessor, 0,
predecessor_item,
contribution_token,
predecessors,
item_lookahead_sets))
Sbitset__set (annotation_node->contributions[ci],
predecessor_item);
}
}
}
if (annotation_node->contributions[ci])
{
Sbitset biter;
Sbitset__Index i;
SBITSET__FOR_EACH (annotation_node->contributions[ci],
(*predecessor)->nitems, biter, i)
{
potential_contribution = true;
if (!lookaheads)
{
size_t j;
lookaheads = xnmalloc ((*predecessor)->nitems,
sizeof *lookaheads);
for (j = 0; j < (*predecessor)->nitems; ++j)
lookaheads[j] = NULL;
}
if (!lookaheads[i])
lookaheads[i] = bitset_create (ntokens, BITSET_FIXED);
bitset_set (lookaheads[i], contribution_token);
}
}
}
}
/* If the predecessor has any contributions besides just "always" and
"never" contributions:
- If the dominant contribution is split-stable, the annotation could
not affect merging on this predecessor state or its eventual
predecessor states. Moreover, all contributions that affect
whether the dominant contribution remains dominant must be "always"
or "never" contributions in order for the dominant contribution to
be split-stable. Thus, the dominant contribution computation result
in eventual successor states will not be affected by lookaheads
tracked for this predecessor state. (Also, as in the isocore
compatibility test, we depend on the fact that isocores with equal
dominant contributions will have the same dominant contribution when
merged. Otherwise, we might have to worry that the presence of a
potential contribution might somehow be the culprit of that behavior
and thus need to be tracked regardless of the split stability of the
dominant contribution.) Thus, go ahead and discard the annotation
to save space now plus time during state splitting.
- Otherwise, record the annotation, and compute any resulting
annotations needed on predecessor states. */
if (potential_contribution)
{
if (ContributionIndex__none
!= AnnotationList__computeDominantContribution (
annotation_node, (*predecessor)->nitems, lookaheads, true))
{
obstack_free (annotations_obstackp, annotation_node);
annotation_node = NULL;
}
{
size_t i;
for (i = 0; i < (*predecessor)->nitems; ++i)
if (lookaheads[i])
bitset_free (lookaheads[i]);
free (lookaheads);
}
if (annotation_node)
{
if (AnnotationList__insertInto (annotation_node,
&annotation_lists[(*predecessor)
->number],
(*predecessor)->nitems))
{
++annotation_counts[(*predecessor)->number];
AnnotationList__computePredecessorAnnotations (
annotation_node, *predecessor,
follow_kernel_items, always_follows, predecessors,
item_lookahead_sets, annotation_lists, annotation_counts,
annotations_obstackp);
}
else
obstack_free (annotations_obstackp, annotation_node);
}
}
else
obstack_free (annotations_obstackp, annotation_node);
}
}
void
AnnotationList__compute_from_inadequacies (
state *s, bitsetv follow_kernel_items, bitsetv always_follows,
state ***predecessors, bitset **item_lookahead_sets,
InadequacyList **inadequacy_lists, AnnotationList **annotation_lists,
AnnotationIndex *annotation_counts,
ContributionIndex *max_contributionsp,
struct obstack *annotations_obstackp,
InadequacyListNodeCount *inadequacy_list_node_count)
{
bitsetv all_lookaheads;
bitset shift_tokens;
bitset conflicted_tokens;
bitset_iterator biter_conflict;
bitset_bindex conflicted_token;
/* Return an empty list if s->lookahead_tokens = NULL. */
if (s->consistent)
return;
all_lookaheads = bitsetv_create (s->nitems, ntokens, BITSET_FIXED);
bitsetv_ones (all_lookaheads);
shift_tokens = AnnotationList__compute_shift_tokens (s->transitions);
conflicted_tokens =
AnnotationList__compute_conflicted_tokens (shift_tokens, s->reductions);
/* Add an inadequacy annotation for each conflicted_token. */
BITSET_FOR_EACH (biter_conflict, conflicted_tokens, conflicted_token, 0)
{
AnnotationList *annotation_node;
/* FIXME: Would a BITSET_FRUGAL or BITEST_SPARSE be more efficient? Now
or convert it inside InadequacyList__new_conflict? */
bitset actions = bitset_create (s->reductions->num + 1, BITSET_FIXED);
ContributionIndex contribution_count = 0;
bool potential_contribution = false;
/* Allocate the annotation node. */
{
int rule_i;
for (rule_i = 0; rule_i < s->reductions->num; ++rule_i)
if (bitset_test (s->reductions->lookahead_tokens[rule_i],
conflicted_token))
++contribution_count;
if (bitset_test (shift_tokens, conflicted_token))
++contribution_count;
annotation_node =
AnnotationList__alloc_on_obstack (contribution_count,
annotations_obstackp);
}
/* Add a contribution for each reduction that has conflicted_token as a
lookahead. */
{
ContributionIndex ci = 0;
int item_i = 0;
int rule_i;
for (rule_i = 0; rule_i < s->reductions->num; ++rule_i)
{
rule *the_rule = s->reductions->rules[rule_i];
if (bitset_test (s->reductions->lookahead_tokens[rule_i],
conflicted_token))
{
bitset_set (actions, rule_i);
/* If this reduction is on a kernel item, just add it. */
if (!item_number_is_rule_number (the_rule->rhs[0]))
{
annotation_node->contributions[ci] =
Sbitset__new_on_obstack (s->nitems,
annotations_obstackp);
/* Catch item_i up to rule_i. This works because both are
sorted on rule number. */
while (!item_number_is_rule_number (
ritem[s->items[item_i]])
|| item_number_as_rule_number (
ritem[s->items[item_i]])
!= the_rule->number)
{
++item_i;
aver (item_i < s->nitems);
}
Sbitset__set (annotation_node->contributions[ci], item_i);
}
/* Otherwise, add the kernel items whose lookahead sets
contribute the conflicted token to this reduction's
lookahead set. */
else if (AnnotationList__compute_lhs_contributions (
s, the_rule, conflicted_token, follow_kernel_items,
always_follows, predecessors, item_lookahead_sets,
&annotation_node->contributions[ci],
annotations_obstackp))
{
annotation_node->contributions[ci++] = NULL;
continue;
}
/* The lookahead token has to come from somewhere. */
aver (!Sbitset__isEmpty (annotation_node->contributions[ci],
s->nitems));
++ci;
potential_contribution = true;
}
}
}
/* If there are any contributions besides just "always" contributions:
- If there's also a shift contribution, record it.
- If the dominant contribution is split-stable, then the annotation
could not affect merging, so go ahead and discard the annotation and
the inadequacy to save space now plus time during state splitting.
- Otherwise, record the annotation and the inadequacy, and compute any
resulting annotations needed on predecessor states. */
if (potential_contribution)
{
if (bitset_test (shift_tokens, conflicted_token))
{
bitset_set (actions, s->reductions->num);
annotation_node->contributions[contribution_count - 1] = NULL;
}
{
InadequacyList *conflict_node =
InadequacyList__new_conflict (
s, symbols[conflicted_token], actions,
inadequacy_list_node_count);
actions = NULL;
annotation_node->inadequacyNode = conflict_node;
if (ContributionIndex__none
!= AnnotationList__computeDominantContribution (
annotation_node, s->nitems, all_lookaheads, true))
{
obstack_free (annotations_obstackp, annotation_node);
InadequacyList__delete (conflict_node);
}
else
{
InadequacyList__prependTo (conflict_node,
&inadequacy_lists[s->number]);
aver (AnnotationList__insertInto (
annotation_node, &annotation_lists[s->number],
s->nitems));
/* This aver makes sure the
AnnotationList__computeDominantContribution check above
does discard annotations in the simplest case of a S/R
conflict with no token precedence. */
aver (!bitset_test (shift_tokens, conflicted_token)
|| symbols[conflicted_token]->prec);
++annotation_counts[s->number];
if (contribution_count > *max_contributionsp)
*max_contributionsp = contribution_count;
AnnotationList__computePredecessorAnnotations (
annotation_node, s,
follow_kernel_items, always_follows, predecessors,
item_lookahead_sets, annotation_lists, annotation_counts,
annotations_obstackp);
}
}
}
else
{
bitset_free (actions);
obstack_free (annotations_obstackp, annotation_node);
}
}
bitsetv_free (all_lookaheads);
bitset_free (shift_tokens);
bitset_free (conflicted_tokens);
}
void
AnnotationList__debug (AnnotationList const *self, size_t nitems, int spaces)
{
AnnotationList const *a;
AnnotationIndex ai;
for (a = self, ai = 0; a; a = a->next, ++ai)
{
{
int j;
for (j = 0; j < spaces; ++j)
putc (' ', stderr);
}
fprintf (stderr, "Annotation %d (manifesting state %d):\n",
ai, a->inadequacyNode->manifestingState->number);
{
ContributionIndex ci;
bitset_bindex rulei = 0; /* init suppresses compiler warning */
rulei = bitset_first (a->inadequacyNode->inadequacy.conflict.actions);
for (ci = 0; ci < a->inadequacyNode->contributionCount; ++ci)
{
symbol_number token =
InadequacyList__getContributionToken (a->inadequacyNode, ci)
->number;
{
int j;
for (j = 0; j < spaces+2; ++j)
putc (' ', stderr);
}
if (ci == InadequacyList__getShiftContributionIndex (
a->inadequacyNode))
fprintf (stderr, "Contributes shift of token %d.\n", token);
else
{
fprintf (stderr, "Contributes token %d", token);
aver (rulei != BITSET_BINDEX_MAX);
fprintf (stderr, " as lookahead, rule number %d",
a->inadequacyNode->manifestingState
->reductions->rules[rulei]->number);
rulei =
bitset_next (a->inadequacyNode->inadequacy.conflict.actions,
rulei+1);
if (AnnotationList__isContributionAlways (a, ci))
fprintf (stderr, " always.");
else
{
fprintf (stderr, ", items: ");
Sbitset__fprint (a->contributions[ci], nitems, stderr);
}
fprintf (stderr, "\n");
}
}
}
}
}
void
AnnotationList__computeLookaheadFilter (AnnotationList const *self,
size_t nitems,
bitsetv lookahead_filter)
{
bitsetv_zero (lookahead_filter);
for (; self; self = self->next)
{
ContributionIndex ci;
for (ci = 0; ci < self->inadequacyNode->contributionCount; ++ci)
if (!AnnotationList__isContributionAlways (self, ci))
{
Sbitset__Index item;
Sbitset biter;
symbol_number token =
InadequacyList__getContributionToken (self->inadequacyNode, ci)
->number;
SBITSET__FOR_EACH (self->contributions[ci], nitems, biter, item)
bitset_set (lookahead_filter[item], token);
}
}
}
/**
* \pre
* - <tt>self != NULL</tt>.
* - \c nitems is the number of kernel items in the LR(0) state that \c self
* annotates.
* - \c lookaheads describes the lookahead sets on the kernel items of some
* isocore of the LR(0) state that \c self annotates. Either:
* - <tt>lookaheads = NULL</tt> only if the lookahead set on every kernel
* item is empty.
* - For any <tt>0 <= i < nitems</tt>, <tt>lookaheads[i]</tt> is either:
* - \c NULL only if the lookahead set on kernel item \c i is empty.
* - The (possibly empty) lookahead set on kernel item \c i.
* - <tt>0 <= ci < self->inadequacyNode->contributionCount</tt>.
* \post
* - \c result = true iff contribution \c ci in \c self is made by the state
* described by \c lookaheads.
*/
static bool
AnnotationList__stateMakesContribution (AnnotationList const *self,
size_t nitems, ContributionIndex ci,
bitset *lookaheads)
{
if (AnnotationList__isContributionAlways (self, ci))
return true;
if (!lookaheads)
return false;
{
symbol_number token =
InadequacyList__getContributionToken (self->inadequacyNode, ci)->number;
Sbitset__Index item;
Sbitset biter;
SBITSET__FOR_EACH (self->contributions[ci], nitems, biter, item)
if (lookaheads[item] && bitset_test (lookaheads[item], token))
return true;
}
return false;
}
ContributionIndex
AnnotationList__computeDominantContribution (AnnotationList const *self,
size_t nitems, bitset *lookaheads,
bool require_split_stable)
{
symbol *token;
ContributionIndex const ci_shift =
InadequacyList__getShiftContributionIndex (self->inadequacyNode);
token = self->inadequacyNode->inadequacy.conflict.token;
/* S/R conflict. */
if (ci_shift != ContributionIndex__none)
{
bool find_stable_domination_over_shift = false;
bool find_stable_error_action_domination = false;
{
ContributionIndex ci;
int actioni;
ContributionIndex ci_rr_dominator = ContributionIndex__none;
int shift_precedence = token->prec;
/* If the token has no precedence set, shift is always chosen. */
if (!shift_precedence)
return ci_shift;
/* Figure out which reductions contribute, which of those would
dominate in a R/R comparison, and whether any reduction dominates
the shift so that the R/R comparison is actually needed. */
for (ci = 0, actioni = bitset_first (self->inadequacyNode->inadequacy
.conflict.actions);
ci < self->inadequacyNode->contributionCount;
++ci, actioni = bitset_next (self->inadequacyNode->inadequacy
.conflict.actions, actioni+1))
{
int reduce_precedence = 0;
if (ci == ci_shift)
continue;
{
rule *r = self->inadequacyNode->manifestingState
->reductions->rules[actioni];
if (r->prec)
reduce_precedence = r->prec->prec;
}
/* If there's no need to check whether this reduction actually
contributes because the shift eliminates it from the R/R
comparison anyway, continue to the next reduction. */
if (reduce_precedence
&& (reduce_precedence < shift_precedence
|| (reduce_precedence == shift_precedence
&& token->assoc == right_assoc)))
continue;
if (!AnnotationList__stateMakesContribution (self, nitems, ci,
lookaheads))
continue;
/* This uneliminated reduction contributes, so see if it can cause
an error action. */
if (reduce_precedence == shift_precedence
&& token->assoc == non_assoc)
{
/* It's not possible to find split-stable domination over
shift after a potential %nonassoc. */
if (find_stable_domination_over_shift)
return ContributionIndex__none;
if (!require_split_stable
|| AnnotationList__isContributionAlways (self, ci))
return ContributionIndex__error_action;
find_stable_error_action_domination = true;
}
/* Consider this uneliminated contributing reduction in the R/R
comparison. */
if (ci_rr_dominator == ContributionIndex__none)
ci_rr_dominator = ci;
/* If precedence is set for this uneliminated contributing
reduction, it dominates the shift, so try to figure out which
reduction dominates the R/R comparison. */
if (reduce_precedence)
{
/* It's not possible to find split-stable error action
domination after a potential reduction. */
if (find_stable_error_action_domination)
return ContributionIndex__none;
if (!require_split_stable)
return ci_rr_dominator;
if (!AnnotationList__isContributionAlways (self,
ci_rr_dominator))
return ContributionIndex__none;
if (AnnotationList__isContributionAlways (self, ci))
return ci_rr_dominator;
find_stable_domination_over_shift = true;
}
}
}
if (find_stable_domination_over_shift
|| find_stable_error_action_domination)
return ContributionIndex__none;
/* No reduce or error action domination found, so shift dominates. */
return ci_shift;
}
/* R/R conflict, so the reduction with the lowest rule number dominates.
Fortunately, contributions are sorted by rule number. */
{
ContributionIndex ci;
for (ci = 0; ci < self->inadequacyNode->contributionCount; ++ci)
if (AnnotationList__stateMakesContribution (self, nitems, ci,
lookaheads))
{
if (require_split_stable
&& !AnnotationList__isContributionAlways (self, ci))
return ContributionIndex__none;
return ci;
}
}
return ContributionIndex__none;
}
|