diff options
author | Diego Biurrun <diego@biurrun.de> | 2007-05-04 19:37:01 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Diego Biurrun <diego@biurrun.de> | 2007-05-04 19:37:01 +0000 |
commit | b0fee7c53c326a28f42905acd5e0ed137389a713 (patch) | |
tree | 032ebf4a240cdd6074ed427fe9d55469b4ea1735 /doc | |
parent | 58683d27435f0137f69ba42654036d13da6cfd82 (diff) | |
download | ffmpeg-b0fee7c53c326a28f42905acd5e0ed137389a713.tar.gz |
Group benchmark items in the patch submission checklist together.
Originally committed as revision 8887 to svn://svn.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg/trunk
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi b/doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi index 30bc235f82..22558e96c1 100644 --- a/doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi +++ b/doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi @@ -1682,6 +1682,8 @@ do not attach several unrelated patches to the same mail. @item If the change is to speed critical code, did you benchmark it? @item + If you did any benchmarks, did you provide them in the mail? +@item Have you checked that the patch does not introduce buffer overflows or other security issues? @item @@ -1710,8 +1712,6 @@ do not attach several unrelated patches to the same mail. Did you provide an example so we can verify the new feature added by the patch easily? @item - If you did any benchmarks, did you provide them in the mail? -@item If you added a new file, did you insert a license header? It should be taken from FFmpeg, not randomly copied and pasted from somewhere else. @item |